Russia Hits Back at the EU's Plan to Lend Frozen Russian Funds to Ukraine
Kyiv remains running out of cash to maintain its armed forces and economy, after nearly four years of the ongoing invasion by Moscow.
From the EU's perspective, the remedy to addressing Kyiv's funding gap of €135.7bn for the coming 24 months rests with Moscow's immobilized funds located within Belgian bank Euroclear, and European Union officials hope to give it the green light at their meeting in Brussels next week.
Authorities in Russia caution the EU plan would be an act of theft, and the Central Bank of Russia declared on Friday it was suing Euroclear in a Moscow court prior to a definitive agreement is made.
'Just' to Use Russia's Funds, Assert European and Ukrainian Officials
Overall, Russia has approximately €210bn of its funds blocked in the EU, and €185bn of that is held by Euroclear.
Brussels and Kyiv argue that money should be used to reconstruct what Russia has devastated: Brussels calls it a "loan for reparations" and has devised a plan to support Ukraine's economy amounting to €90bn.
"It is appropriate that Moscow's blocked funds should be used to rebuild what Russia has destroyed – and that money then becomes Ukraine's," says Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky.
Germany's leader Friedrich Merz says the assets will "help Ukraine to protect itself successfully against any future Russian attacks".
The legal move by Moscow was anticipated in Brussels. But it is not only Moscow that is dissatisfied.
Authorities in Brussels is concerned it will be burdened by an massive bill if it all backfires, and Euroclear CEO Valérie Urbain says using the assets could "undermine the global financial architecture".
Euroclear also has an approximate €16-17bn immobilised in Russia.
Belgian Prime Minister Bart de Wever has set the EU a series of "rational, reasonable, and justified conditions" before he will accept the reconstruction loan scheme, and he has left open the possibility of legal action if it "carries significant risks" for his country.
What is the EU's Plan?
Brussels is working to the wire ahead of next Thursday's summit to agree on a arrangement that Belgium can agree to.
Previously the EU has held off using the assets themselves directly but starting in 2024 has transferred the "extraordinary revenues" from them to Ukraine. In 2024 that was €3.7bn. Legally, using the profits is considered permissible as Russia is sanctioned and the earnings are not Moscow's sovereign assets.
But global military support for Ukraine has declined sharply in 2025, and Europe has struggled to make up the deficit caused by the US decision to largely cease funding Ukraine under President Donald Trump.
There are presently two EU proposals designed to furnishing Ukraine with €90bn, to finance a large portion of its financial requirements.
- One is to secure the capital on financial markets, guaranteed by the EU budget as a guarantee. This is Belgium's favored solution but it needs a agreement by all by EU leaders and that would be problematic when Hungary and Slovakia oppose funding Ukraine's military.
- That leaves loaning Ukraine cash from the Russian assets, which were originally held in bonds but have now mostly matured into cash. That money is owned by Euroclear located within the European Central Bank.
Brussels' executive arm accepts Belgium has justified fears and says it is convinced it has addressed them.
The proposal is for Belgium to be shielded with a assurance covering all the €210bn of Russian assets in the EU.
Should Euroclear incur losses of its own assets in Russia, the loss would be compensated from assets belonging to Russia's own clearing house which are in the EU.
Should Russia took legal action against Belgium itself, any judgment by a Russian court would not be enforced in the EU.
In a significant move, EU ambassadors are expected to agree on Friday to permanently block Russia's central bank assets held in Europe indefinitely.
Previously they have had to vote by consensus every six months to renew the freeze, which could have meant a ongoing risk to Belgium.
The EU ambassadors are planning to use an special provision under Article 122 of the EU Treaties so the assets stay blocked as long as an "direct danger to the economic interests of the union" continues.
The Reasons Belgium is Still Not Satisfied
Brussels is firm it remains a strong supporter of Ukraine, but sees legal risks in the plan and worries about being shouldering the fallout if things fail.
A normally partisan political environment in this case has come together in support of Prime Minister Bart de Wever, who is being pressured from fellow EU leaders.
"Belgium has a modest-sized economy. Belgian GDP is about €565bn – imagine if it would need to bear a €185bn bill," says Veerle Colaert, professor of financial law at KU Leuven University.
Although the EU might be able to obtain adequate guarantees for the loan itself, Belgium worries about an further exposure of being exposed to extra fines or liabilities.
Prof Colaert also believes the requirement for Euroclear to provide a loan to the EU would contravene EU banking regulations.
"Banks need to comply with prudential rules and shouldn't concentrate risk. Now the EU is telling Euroclear to do precisely that.
"What is the purpose of these banking laws? It's because we want banks to be stable. And if things turn sour it would become the responsibility of Belgium to rescue Euroclear. That's an additional reason why it's so crucial for Belgium to secure water-tight protections for Euroclear."
Europe Under Pressure from All Sides
Time is of the essence, state several EU member states including those closest to Russia such as the Baltics, Finland and Poland. They maintain the frozen assets plan is "the most fiscally viable and practically possible solution".
"It's a matter of destiny for us," states leading German conservative MP Norbert Röttgen. "Should we not succeed, I don't know what we'll do next. That's why we have to succeed in a week's time".
Although Russia is unyielding its money should not be accessed, there are further worries among EU officials that the US may want to employ Russia's frozen billions for another purpose, as part of its own peace initiative.
Zelensky has stated Ukraine is working with Europe and the US on a rebuilding fund, but he is also mindful the US has been talking to Russia about possible partnership.
An initial document of the US peace plan mentioned $100bn of Russia's frozen assets being used by the US for reconstruction, with the US {taking|receiving